At the end of last month the growing grass roots opposition to ethanol received a boost as a state legislature, David Campbell, introduced a bill that would ban ethanol from being blended with gasoline in the state of New Hampshire.
One report said, "Equipment repair shops all over the Northeast report growing problems with engines caused by gasoline containing the current EPA-mandated 10 percent ethanol, or “E-10” gas. The engines, many of which are two-cycle, weren’t engineered to accommodate the differing characteristics of E-10 fuel, leading to an array of problems, including hard starting, erratic running, internal damage and eventual failure."
If this is happening in the northeast, it's happening everywhere this type of equipment is being used. It's either being underreported, neglected, or equipment users aren't aware of the cause behind their equipment failures.
This is similar to bad gas in a car which has damaged the device which measures how much gas is in the tank. You don't know it until a number of people discover they've been victims of the same problem, and figure out it has come from the same cause.
With all this being done at the "E-10" level, think of what will happen at the "E-15" or "E-20" level, which is being pushed unethically by the ethanol industry.
"There’s lots more of that to come if EPA allows E-15, E-20 or higher ethanol blends to come to market," says Kris Kiser of OEPI (Outdoor Power Equipment Institute), a Washington trade group.
So why is this outrage being perpetrated upon people?
Kiser says this:
“We’re now using less gasoline across the country, so the ethanol lobby is trying to force more ethanol onto the market."
If that were to happen, Kiser says most “'legacy equipment'-outdoor equipment engines made before 2008" will break down.
Some state bureaucrats form the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services are discouraging Cambell in his fight saying the state won't receive gas under the current federal ethanol mandates if he pursues this course.
But as Cambell said, "if New Hampshire bans it we’ll be the first state to do it, but if 10, 20 or 30 states eventually come along I say it will stop the idiocy."
I think he's right. That many states banning it will undermine the completely misguided, and in some cases, unethical, foisting of ethanol upon the public.
Many of the supporters behind the legislation are owners of snowmobiles, weed whackers, chainsaws and outboard boat motors, or any other similar equipment. Once word gets out on the terrible damage to users' equipment, it shouldn't take long before the ethanol debacle is finally and thankfully buried.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I just got back from Maine. I was able to ride for 1 and a half days and blew a piston due to ethanol. It cost me my vacation and who knows what the cost will be to fix the sled.
Great article you got here. I'd like to read something more concerning this matter. The only thing your blog needs is a few photos of some gizmos.
Katherine Kripke
Cell phone blocker
just had ethanol fuel and my sled just quit running on the trail.
drained and refilled with premium and got lucky runs fine
Are you kidding? We've run every motor on our farm including chainsaws, lawn mowers, pickups, tractors, and cars for over ten years and never had a breakdown. The EPA has tested thousands of engines, both 2 and 4 cycle and not one engine failure due to ethanol. Merrill Lynch says ethanol has lowered the price of gasoline by more than 50 cents per gallon by increasing the supply. You would have to be nuts to want to get rid of ethanol.
fefoxypelup xaikalitag Steeseaparl [url=http://uillumaror.com]iziananatt[/url] Addidenax http://gusannghor.com Kililiarp
Post a Comment